 |
Student Interactive
Here is a sample Abstract from a study that got full marks in a
national examination in psychology. Read it carefully, and without
really knowing much about the topic, try to answer the questions
that follow!
| Abstract
This study investigated the Stroop Effect as identified by J.
Ridley Stroop (1935), which concludes that interference
influences performance on serial verbal recall tasks. Stroop's
experiment was partially replicated using two from three of his
original independent variables. Twenty-two participants were
selected for the current study by opportunity sampling, and were
required to state aloud the colours of words in six lists while
being timed. Analysis of recorded results using a related t-test
gave a t value of 7.71. Critical t for a two-tailed test at the
0.05 level of significance with 21 degrees of freedom has a
tabled value of 2.080. This saw rejection of the null hypothesis
and acceptance of the experimental hypothesis H1:
'That there will be a significant difference in participants'
information processing times under two conditions of the
independent variable as a consequence of the Stroop Effect.'
|
Questions
1 What was the aim of this student's study?
2 What background study did this student rely on to help her in her
research investigation? Give reasons for your answer.
3 What did this psychologist conclude in his original study?
4 How many participants took part in the student's study, and what
sampling method was used? What does this term mean?
5 What did each participant have to do?
6 What statistical measure, or test, was used in this study?
7 In this experiment to apply the related t-test we have to know
our degrees of freedom. This is dead simple to work out.
Degrees of freedom use the formula N-1, where N is the number of
participants who took part in the study. You thus subtract 1 from
whatever N is in your study. If you were replicating this study with
20 participants, how many degrees of freedom would your study then
have?.
8 Why was this student able to reject her null hypothesis and
accept her experimental? Give reasons for your answer.
9 Why were her results significant?
10 Why despite this should we be wary of her results? A clue lies
in the word 'probability' and the level of significance chosen.
Make sure YOUR Abstract is written as well as this one
containing all that it has.
Now comes the Introduction,
which should be on the next page of your report.
Click here to continue on to the
Introduction
Or Here to go back to the Abstract
|
|